Wednesday, September 21, 2005


Brendan Duffy, guest blogging

Australia split off from Pangea maybe 120 million years ago, before us Eutherian ‘placental’ mammals had evolved from our pouched relatives in what was to become Asia. All across Pangea the inferior pouched model was supplanted by the latest triumph in evolution with its long internal gestation, but not in Australia. Australia (and Antarctica) travelled the southern ocean in isolation, carrying a cargo of ‘ancient’ flora and fauna into the present. Antarctic marsupials became extinct.

Waves of exotic placental invaders have washed up on our shores, particularly ones that could get here under their own steam, such as the flying and swimming ones; bats, seals, and dugongs, although rodents made it, too. It took the walking ones quite a while. The first wave of human invaders, as Tim Flannery tells us in The Future Eaters, hunted the marsupial megafauna to extinction, then were forced to develop a more sustainable resource management strategy, or harmony. Chris Gregory tells it a slightly different way in his excellent short story ‘Mock Chicken’.

The second wave of human invaders occurred 220 years ago. Since then Australia has suffered more species loss than the rest of the world combined.

In 1859 twenty four European rabbits were released near Geelong, and by 1910 they had spread across most of the continent, occupying all but the alpine and tropical areas. Current Australian rabbit population is estimated at 200-300 million, descended from the genetic bottleneck of those 24 founders. Rabbits cause approx $600 million damage to agriculture per annum, severe environmental degradation, desertification, and compete with native wildlife for resource and habitat.

Typical local control methods have included destroying warrens through ripping, ploughing, blasting, and fumigating; poison baiting; shooting and hunting with dogs and ferrets; rabbit proof fencing; and, unfortunately, releasing predators such as cats and foxes. Against such a huge rabbit population these largely manual methods have a small impact, so, on a national scale, Australians did what they were good at: biological ‘control’ – introducing MORE exotic animals to combat the ones now reaching plague proportions. Much like the old lady who swallowed a fly, things can escalate.

Myxomatosis, a mosquito borne myxoma virus, was released in 1950 and killed an estimated 95-99% of all rabbits within 18 months, but with no nationwide follow up to manually finish the job, or at least keep numbers low, the rabbit population soon bounced back with increased immunity. Furthermore, the host-pathogen relationship changed in the wild, and new strains emerged which were less virulent. Still, myxomatosis remains an active biological control agent whose efficacy appears to have reached an equilibrium, keeping rabbit populations at half that of the 1940s.

Efforts to increase the efficacy of the virus included the introduction of two new Myxomatosis carrying flea species to Australia, the European rabbit flea in 1968 and the Spanish rabbit flea in 1990. Both saw the myxomatosis transmission rate increase. Australia’s exotic menagerie continues to expand.

The rabbit calicivirus disease, RCD, was first recorded in China in 1984. Modes of transmission include the blowfly, which will transmit the virus from an infected carcass, unlike myxomatosis which requires the mosquito vector to sample live blood. Also unlike Myxoma, RCD is an RNA virus and mutates 106 times faster. In 1995 Australian researchers were testing this virus as a possible biological control agent under quarantine conditions on Wardang Island, 5 km off the South Australian coast. It jumped to the mainland, presumably on flies, and rapidly spread across south eastern Australia, with a 95% kill in peak areas. Stories abounded of people driving around the country selling infected rabbit carcasses to farmers in order to spread the virus more quickly and alleviate pressure caused by the rabbit plague. It is estimated that more than 30 million rabbits died in southern Australia during October–November 1995.

However, the new black in biocontrol is Immunocontraception. It is a method whereby a sexually transmitted viral disease from the target species is genetically modified. Basically, genes encoding the target species’ fertility factors, such as sperm and/or egg proteins, are spliced into the viral genome downstream from the viral coat proteins, so that when the virus replicates, the progeny display their normal viral antigens PLUS the host animal’s fertility factors. Infected animals make antibodies against the virus AND their own fertility factors. As a consequence they become sterile while their health and quality of life remain unaffected, unlike myxo and RCD. Immunocontraception is lauded as humane (although some have suggested using lactation controlling genes so that young will starve).

Immunocontraceptive methodologies can be applied to all of Australia’s pest species. It targets their most successful attribute – high fertility. Alpha males and females spread the disease fast, and their symptomless behaviour allows them to compete as normal, stopping uninfecteds from breeding. Immunocontraceptive biocontrol has not yet been trialed in Australia, but success has been achieved with the house mouse in lab conditions.

So are biological agents safe, effective, and controllable? Where did RCD come from? Why are there genetically related viruses with different hosts? Is it because viruses can mutate and change hosts? How did Brisbane horse trainer Vic Rail die? A mystery virus, eventually identified as the Hendra virus, closely related to the emerging Nippah virus that plagues Malaysian pig farms, occasionally kills the farmers, and can be carried by migratory flying foxes (all eutherian mammals). Most mammals have the same genes and many those genes have highly conserved coding sequences. So, viruses emerge, mutate, and jump species. What will happen if Immunocontraceptive viruses are released?

Australia has seen the introduction of many pest species (as Robert VanderMeer would know). Biocontrol of pest species should be dealt with carefully. Successes like the control of Patterson’s Curse and Prickly Pear are not always attained. One thing is sure, if rabbit numbers are to be reduced, the numbers of introduced rabbit predators such as the red fox should likewise be reduced, less the native wildlife fall prey to hungry mouths.

Brendan Duffy has a PhD in the evolution of mammalian sex chromosomes, and was involved with screening marsupial Y chromosome libraries for candidate immunocontraceptive genes to target the Australian Possum, an animal introduced to New Zealand to provide a fur trade. NZ’s lack of predators has lead to a plague of possums running rampant in New Zealand. They are a bioreservoir of bovine tuberculosis, and threaten the NZ ecology and dairy industry. Many Australian pest animals are currently being considered for Immunocontraceptive management strategies. Brendan has a story about Australian Immunocontraception appearing in ASIM 21.


At 6:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

At 7:04 AM, Blogger Jason Erik Lundberg said...

Excellent biological lesson, Mr. Duffy. I had no idea about all the measures being used to reduce the rabbit population, and the immunocontraception option, while fascinating and humane, would indeed be frightening if it jumped to, say, humans.

At 9:03 PM, Anonymous Anna said...

Yeah, Duffy, great stuff. I can testify that the escape from the lab of the 1995 rabbit final solution went around Australia faster than a man can scoff a sausage roll. It hit these parts and wiped out all but a few rabbits in a remarkably short period of time. All but a few, which is the bugger. As for knowing what they're doing, the ignorance and misconceptions about what's going on in Australia, with invaders and natives, is so great that I despair of any solutions that don't complicate things even more, in detrimental ways. Australia's main wildlife and conservation problem is that while there are many scientists, there are almost no naturalists. Actual observation is so paltry that you get gov't fostered fairy tales told as fact, and no one is refuting it. "Wildlife in the Home Paddock", a gov't funded classic, is a case in point. It states categorically that wombats don't dig holes in river/creek banks, when in fact, that is a favoured place, especially between the roots of established trees, which are undermined and crash into the water at the next flood. Planting trees along the banks is another joke (and protecting them against roos with mesh), in a land where the water doesn't run sluggish as the Mississippi, but with the passion and speed of the usually parched. I would love to accompany the authors of this crap through waterways filled with the realities of their misconceptions. The use of 1080 should be a national disgrace, as it is spread around with an abandon that ignores the fact that this poisoned bait is also attractive to goannas, who, since regular 1080ing for dogs and foxes, have almost disappeared in one area I know intimately. Wombats are commonly killed by frustrated farmers, but when they ask a crowd like some gov't-sanctioned wildlife group to remove them from a creek area, or a paddock where their holes are big enough to house a children's tea party, and to lose calves, they are told that you can't move a wombat because it won't get along in a new society. Wombats are as social as a man who walks down the street yelling, "Piss off!"
As for this new play with viruses, this is part of a worldwide trend that is ignoring the ability of viruses to jump, and the consequences when they do. The NY Times reports today about a horse virus that has jumped to dogs, in "Deadly Contagious Dog Flu Virus is Detected in 7 States".

But then, I disagree about all invaders being bad. There is a kind of wowser's glee that exhibits itself in ugly ways sometimes, when some of Australia's more greenminded sorts venture into the bush.

At 4:13 PM, Anonymous Kate Eltham said...

Sometimes I forget how much our perspectives are altered by where we live in Australia, Duffy, it being such an enormous continent we live on.

Rabbits just don't figure a great deal in our physical or psychological landscape up here in Queensland.

But pests and invaders? Biological control gone horribly wrong?

I give you: the cane toad.

Introduced in the 1930s as a mechanism of biological control to eat Cane Beetles, which were munching their way through Queensland's lucrative sugar cane crops, it was soon discovered that while cane toads could eat cane beetles, almost nothing was a predator of the toad.

They have now spread to all parts of Queensland, their rate of spread is up to 50km per year in the Northern Territory and 5km per year in Northern New South Wales.

They are so numerous in tropical north Queensland that it is something of a local pastime to see how many you can 'pop' with the tyres of your ute along a stretch of road.

My personal favourite tools for dispensing with cane toads are:
1. The cricket bat (elicits a satisfying 'thwack')
2. The golf club (an iron is best, you can really sling that toad a good distance)

At 4:42 AM, Anonymous Grace said...

yeah, I've never had any direct experience of the rabbit thing, either. On our property we always had hares, but we were allowed to like them and think they were cute because they were apparently harmless, building "nests" instead of burrows or something like that. Someone please enlighten me if I'm wrong.
Our main issue was with foxes, which killed our chooks (mind you, goannas ate the eggs anyway), wild dogs (those mythical beasts that, along with dingos, I was always afraid of running into when walking alone up on the ridge), and various plants, especially thistles and blackthorn. Earlier this year I saw a group of brumbies running through the trees, a very fantasy moment.
hey, Anna, I agree with you about the weirdness of native=good and introduced=evil. When I was younger I used to come back from a walk with a plant that I liked the look of, look it up to see what it was, and be very disappointed to find it was introduced, and therefore I couldn't like it as much.

At 4:47 AM, Blogger Steve Austin said...

Enjoyable blog. Please check out my dog gift blog.

At 8:26 AM, Blogger musica said...

Great blog, it very nice. To found additional information about dogs or pets visit dog training The Best dog training

At 12:46 AM, Blogger jon said...

I was searching for dog sam ugliest info and found this post. I agree totally!


At 3:41 PM, Blogger musica said...

Great blog, it very nice. To found additional information about dogs or pets visit dog trainer The Best dog trainer

At 3:16 AM, Blogger davidbaer said...

Often we forget the little guy, the SMB, in our discussions of the comings and goings of the Internet marketing industry. Sure there are times like this when a report surfaces talking about their issues and concerns but, for the most part, we like to talk about big brands and how they do the Internet marketing thing well or not so well.

At 8:05 AM, Blogger John Pinem said...

You may have not intended to do so, but I think you have managed to express the state of mind that a lot of people are in. The sense of wanting to help, but not knowing how or where, is something a lot of us are going through. Replica Watches

At 1:34 AM, Blogger Nikola said...

Did you know then originaly Australia was just a prison. And nobody had cheapest auto insurance. Thats too bad

At 7:44 AM, Blogger Roweliza Lulu said...

Hi – It’s good to read such interesting stuff on the Internet as I have been able to discover here. I agree with much of what is written here and I’ll be coming back to this website again. Thanks again for posting such great reading material!!

Test and Tag Brisbane
rcd testing services brisbane


Post a Comment

<< Home